Gaming Grandma
Hello, grandchildren! Today I will tell you a fairy tale about the best game in the world, which is called....
3 warning signs, 3 points
Three or more points: I leave it out of search results unless you ask to see curators with several signs.
- Never says noIt recommended 2,095 of the 2,095 games it rated and turned down none. Some honest curators only post games they like, so read a few of its reviews.1 pt
- 4.9 posts a dayIts latest 102 posts span 21 days, about 4.9 a day.1 pt
- 19% high-value followersSteam counts only 19% of its followers as "high value" accounts. For half the curators I track it's over 55%. Bought or bot followers would push this down.1 pt
Each sign comes with the reason, so you can check it. How each sign works.
When it posts
One square per day over the last year. Real reviewers post a few times a week; resellers post in floods.
I've read 102 of its posts, back to Oct 11, 2026. Steam shows the latest 100 at a time, so older days may be missing.
Follower history
Bought followers arrive in jumps. Real curators gain a few a day.
I record every curator's followers once a day, starting Oct 31, 2026. The chart appears after three readings, and marks any jump of 500 or more in a week. Nobody else keeps this history, and it can't be filled in after the fact.
Same games, same days
No other curator recommended 8 or more of the same games on the same days. That's the normal case.
What it covers
Share of its 102 positive and informational posts I've read whose game carries the tag. Broad tags like Indie and Action are left out.
How it rates
Of the posts I've read in the last two years. All time on Steam: 2,095 recommended, 0 not, 1 informational.
Recent posts
The latest 12 of the 102 posts I've read. All 1,781 on Steam