Game Journalists Hate It, So You Know It's good
Western game journalists are bias, shills, corrupted by access journalism and often driven by agendas to the point they hate on games that don't fit their narratives. I show games journalists hate or shill for
None of my checks flagged it
It ranks normally in searches. Read a few of its reviews before you send a key.
Each sign comes with the reason, so you can check it. How each sign works.
When it posts
One square per day over the last year. Real reviewers post a few times a week; resellers post in floods.
I've read 59 of its posts, back to Oct 6, 2024.
Follower history
Bought followers arrive in jumps. Real curators gain a few a day.
I record every curator's followers once a day, starting Oct 31, 2026. The chart appears after three readings, and marks any jump of 500 or more in a week. Nobody else keeps this history, and it can't be filled in after the fact.
Same games, same days
No other curator recommended 8 or more of the same games on the same days. That's the normal case.
What it covers
Share of its 31 positive and informational posts I've read whose game carries the tag. Broad tags like Indie and Action are left out.
How it rates
Of the posts I've read in the last two years. All time on Steam: 30 recommended, 29 not, 1 informational.
Recent posts
The latest 12 of the 59 posts I've read. All 59 on Steam